the HOB I.O.C.P. SPRING 2020 –
Reflection, the acknowledgment of ignorance!
humbled in gratitude, lost in ignorance!
This Humanity is drawing the first ‘line’ in a plane not yet define by Our Cognitive Qualities, We could name it ‘X’ and it would imply a ‘Y’ and a ‘Z’, and it would takes Us further away from what We search, a new realm and a cognitive ability to understand it, resent it, experience it, some say a new ‘Vision’ of existence, others ‘a transcending momentum’, Our Consciousness is slowly (light speed) emerging to new Law(s), evolving once more to a new paradigm.
The changes that are ongoing are demanding Our sub-consciousness to take command, to fast for the Mind, from the Eye to the Atom, nothing from the outside can or will come to disturb a permutation of a now Universal scale, and for the eyes nothing, these most minute mechanism involving ‘photon’ and ‘phonon’ render in equal form and imperfect reflection this reality, in existence and full consciousness Humanity await. This is the HOB Reflection Spring 2020
As Space is exponentially being ‘stretch’, Time(s) seams to be static, meaning not augmenting the quality of its pace, permanent, in Time(s) in an impermanent reality, one Self!
To understand it, We must deep in the dimensional world of Anthropology qt/We [anthropologists] have been the first to insist on a number of things: that the world does not divide into the pious and the superstitious; that there are sculptures in jungles and paintings in deserts; that political order is possible without centralized power and principled justice without codified rules; that the norms of reason were not fixed in Greece, the evolution of morality not consummated in England. Most important, we were the first to insist that we see the lives of others through lenses of our own grinding and that they look back on ours through ones of their own. —Clifford Geertz // here
Reflection Spring 2020 – the acknowledgement of ignorance!
MAPS, a fundamental
Maps in its common use, enable Us to locate ourselves with remarkable precisions, on this Planet, Earth, and more so in Our Galaxy, the Cosmos is an ongoing event. If We look at it this way, Time(s) can be seen as a Map, it allow Us to locate Ourselves in time, but with reference to what?, with reference to this reality!, on Earth Our time is the Time(s) of the real it is so why We use a Photon as a reference, but looking at it from a Celestial point of view, Our reference change and becomes tools to appreciate better the where in Space and when in Time(s), Cosmic Time(s) that is and it propose Us to accept further the Entropy of this Verse and the immutability of Time(s), and facing Our consistent effort to ignore Our Celestial existence would be like asking to be removed from this reality, as the title state, fundamental, so can We approach the consequential effect and affect of Our Emotional vibrations as a Map, enabling Us to locate Ourselves in Space, Time(s) and Being.
Ext//‘We’ are Homo sapiens and our species’ intellectual abilities distinguish us from all other animals. Our technological sophistication, capacity for introspection, and ability to create and manipulate symbols is unrivalled. We engage in behaviors that are profoundly unique, such as the production of personal ornamentation, language, art and music, and the performance of religious rituals. This behavioral discontinuity has prompted many to regard modern humans as standing apart from the rest of nature. Yet, despite our distinctiveness, ‘we’ are also one among several species of great ape, displaying more than 99% nonsynonymous DNA sequence similarity with chimpanzees (Wildman et al. 2003), having diverged from each other approximately 4–8 Ma (Bradley, 2008). Consequently, modern humans share many phenotypic traits with these close relatives through common descent. The tension between striking behavioral divergence in the face of phylogenetic continuity presents a puzzle. Although many authors have discussed the possible selective advantages and evolutionary processes underlying the emergence of modern human cognition (e.g. Holloway, 1967; Calvin, 1994; Dunbar, 1996; Tomasello, 1999; Tooby & Cosmides, 2005), it still remains a serious challenge to understand how the unique features of modern human behavior are mapped onto evolutionary changes in neural structure.
Considering the dramatic behavioral differences between modern humans and other animals, it is reasonable to expect similarly remarkable alterations in brain organization. As Darwin noted in The Descent of Man (1871), there appears to be a link between our intelligence and our expanded brain, which increased in size by roughly threefold since the last common ancestor (LCA) shared by hominins (the lineage including modern humans and our fossil close relatives and ancestors) and panins (the lineage including common chimpanzees, bonobos, and their fossil close relatives and ancestors). Because a large brain size so clearly distinguishes modern humans, many theories of human cognitive evolution consider only this single anatomical variable to account for the myriad specialized behaviors we exhibit (e.g. Jerison, 1973; Dunbar, 1996).// here,…
Knowledge, its definition, source and method in which it is acquired has been discussed (at least) since the time of the philosophical debates by Aristotle and Plato. We would, therefore, propose that the initial emergence of the terms comes from these discussions and that the suggestions on how to deal with efficient and effective knowledge transfer and sharing has been ongoing to a varying degree of intensity since then.
The reemergence of the terms can be traced to two different streams of research. The first can be found in product innovation and technology transfer literature in which the relationship and communication between units have been studied (e.g. Allen, 1977; Clark and Fujimoto, 1991).
The second stream is based on the writings of Michael Polanyi and the terms tacit and explicit knowledge. In an influential Harvard Business Review article, Ikujiro Nonaka touches on the issues of KT and KS, even though he does not mention them explicitly. He writes “Explicit knowledge is formal and systematic. For this reason, it can be easily communicated and shared…” (Nonaka, 1991: 98).
Later in the same article, he says “This helps create a “common cognitive ground” among employees and thus facilitates the transfer of tacit knowledge.” (Nonaka, 1991: 102). These two streams have, to some extent, merged after Nonaka‟s original article. Since that article and later articles and books by him (such as Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995), in which they say that KS is a critical stage in KT) have had a strong impact on the research community, we regard this as the starting point for the reemergence of KT and KS as we know them today.
Since then, the terms have developed gradually and extensively. Initially, the terms were used interchangeably (e.g. Badaracco, 1991; Hansen, 1999) but lately there has been an ongoing separation between them, which we will demonstrate in the following sections.// read here//
Despite Our best efforts to ignore Our own state of ignorance, something twisted with a Human phenomenon, ‘convictions’, which may as well be the very Reason(s) of this existence, a ‘Powerfull Will’ keeping the very Atom’s of this reality together.
As far has Human can see, Atom and so on!
– While it can be observed instantaneously, it cannot be determined both where it is and its velocity. The speed of an electron can be observed, but not with knowing its position. The position of an electron can be observed, but not with knowing its velocity…./ learn more here//
//…. we live in a very biological reality,……
what would it take for all to change,…
… at this rate of entropy, anything would do!/
//In fact, photons are the only things that humans can directly see. A photon is a bit of light. Human eyes are specifically designed to detect light. This happens when a photon enters the eye and is absorbed by one of the rod or cone cells that cover the retina on the inner back surface of the eye. When you look at a chair, you are not actually seeing a chair. You are seeing a bunch of photons that have reflected off of the chair. In the process of reflecting off of the chair, these photons have been arranged in a pattern that resembles the chair. When the photons strike your retina, your cone and rod cells detect this pattern and send it to your brain. In this way, your brain thinks it’s looking at a chair when it’s really looking at a bunch of photons arranged in a chair pattern.
Your eyes can see bunches of photons, but can they see a single, isolated photon? Each rod cell in your eye is indeed capable of detecting a single, isolated photon. However, the neural circuitry in your eye only passes a signal along to the brain if several photons are detected at about the same time//here….
As physics evolves, the image of the proton that quantum chromodynamics has given us may come to seem reassuringly concrete and solid—although solid is just what a proton is not. Flying into one—if you can imagine doing that, riding the strong force in a kind of subnuclear glider—would be like falling through Earth’s atmosphere. The upper atmosphere of the proton is a thin cirrus of virtual quark-antiquark pairs; they form a shield for what lies below. As you fall past them, the atmosphere gets denser and denser, the clouds thicker and thicker. Your plane is struck with increasing frequency and force by flashes of color lightning—the gluons. And then, perhaps four fifths of the way through your descent, you emerge from the cloud cover. The ride is calmer now. The lightning bolts have not disappeared; they have fused to a continuous sheet, and somehow you feel at once featherlight and immune from all forces. You’re near the center of the proton now, utterly trapped as you fall toward the asymptote of utter freedom, and you are finding . . . not much.// continue reading/
The practical benefits are easy to grasp: Sound waves propagate at a speed that is about five orders of magnitude less than the speed of light, and the wavelength of sound is thus correspondingly shorter than that of light of the same frequency. This feature can enable highly precise, nondestructive measurements and imaging, as well as achieve a high concentration of energy with focused sound waves. The present work
opens new perspectives for the relationship between noise and non-Hermitian physics, with potential applications in related fields such as signal processing technologies. The system can be used as an on-chip phononic device analogous to fully integrated photonic devices for information processing. More interestingly, the studied platform can broaden insights in non-Hermitian physics by enabling the detection and control of EPs in two-level or multi-level systems. // continue reading here//
the glue of the everything … learn more here
Observable interference, the very Action(s) of observing, creating existence, unknowingly in control of the Atom and ignoring Our Celestial Bound, Human are in quest for a language, a new source of understanding, in face of existence, what else would it be!
Patience. Easy thought for an uneasy Time(s), the thrive or win, promises. Water is a good indicator, the more strength you apply the stronger it get, and in Time(s) of Emergent Complexity an experience is revealed, that Our most Powerful state, in Trust of Ourselves, demands Us to join a process already at works for Eon’s and concluding the experiencing of this 4th Dimension with Time(s), and in order to continue Our journey, We must become Student of Ourselves, an Individual quest demanding Us to create a ‘cocoon’ of Trust, only answer to Fear. Most knowledge, occulted or not, have come to an end, a conclusion of service. Vestige of a Dimension from which most knowledge was unconsciously aggregated, slowly superposed and entirely assimilated.
//Humans had been speaking for a couple hundred thousand years before they got the inspiration or nerve to mark their ideas down for posterity. But when a Mesopotamian people called the Sumerians finally did scratch out a few bookkeeping symbols on clay tablets 5,000 years ago, they unknowingly started a whole new era in history we call, well … history. The presence of written sources denotes the technical dividing line between what scholars classify as prehistory versus what they call history, which starts at different times depending on what part of the world you’re studying./read here
…., for a Planetary Civilization and an Ethical Humanity,
the HOB Reflection Srping 2020 – the acknowledgement of ignorance.